Engines like PhaserJS have hundreds of contributors.īecause their code is public, you can also look at existing issues, which helps assess whether the tool might work for you.įor hobbyists or independent developers, another benefit of open-source technologies is that they come at no cost. With a closed-source technology, you won’t be able to fix a bug or optimize a part of the engine for your needs and may get stuck late in production.Īs fellow professionals can contribute with open-source projects, you may see bugs get fixed quickly by other teams. On the other hand, the engine being a black box, as with Unity, can cost you in long projects. Some free and open-source projects are getting there, but when it comes to the user interface, sometimes, they may not be on par with closed-source counterparts. With some proprietary software, you may benefit from having a large, dedicated team of engineers developing polished editors and cutting-edge features. It can be hard to pick one over the other. Today, proprietary and open-source technologies coexist. With that in mind, let’s go over a few aspects to consider when browsing for a game engine. An engine that worked for your previous game might not be the best for the next project, either. A framework that works well for us might not work for you. Every developer has to weigh the pros of each option based on their needs. When it comes to picking the right tool for any job, there isn’t a simple answer that works for everyone.
It will give you an introduction to game engines. If you’re just starting out, check out our guide Game Engine Basics.
This guide is for people who already have some experience making games and would like to pick the right tool for their next project. In this article, we are looking at a few questions you should ask yourself when browsing for game engines.
0 kommentar(er)
